MATRIX GATEKEEPERS PARENTS PARTNERS AND PRIESTS
- ParrisVstefanow
- 2 days ago
- 14 min read
We want our children to live in a free world, right? Then why don't we even allow them to live in a free home?
Intergenerational conditioning by parents of their children is one of the greatest of all gatekeeping activities.
If the parent is a Christian, Muslim, voter for this political party or that, a racist, a sexist, working class, middle class, upper class, whatever, that is the conditioning they overwhelmingly insist on imposing upon their offspring.
The child is conditioned to be a reflection of the parent and the pressure to be like them can be enormous.
The very idea that a vehement Christian or Muslim, or Jew, or Hindu, would respect their child's right from birth to reach their own conclusions without pressure to conform to their parents' beliefs, would be utterly abhorrent to such people.
Indeed most could not begin to comprehend such a level of mental and emotional respect for their child's uniqueness, and freedom of thought and expression.
As I said at the start of the book, I debated at the Oxford Union with the former Chief Rabbi of Great Britain and he could not see the difference between information and indoctrination.
"How can I do the best for my children," he said, or words to that effect, "If I do not bring them up to believe what is right?"
No, Rabbi, what you believe is right. That's not informing them of your view;
.......it is indoctrinating your beliefs while suppressing and discrediting all alternative versions of reality.
It's mind control. Priests, rabbis, bishops, popes, and all the rest of the long-frock brigade are professional gatekeepers working for those who control the Matrix.
Yet most of them are so mesmerized by the Matrix themselves, they have no idea that this is so. It is the same with the vast majority of parents.
It goes further. Parents, conditioned by their parents, who were conditioned by theirs, and so on, often decide what is best for their children even after they leave the nest.
I met a guy once in his 60s who was still being destroyed inside by the guilt that he did not achieve what his father wanted for him. Well bollocks to the father, I say.
If he is such a parental dictator and emotional manipulator, he deserves to be friggin' disappointed.
Do him good. But how many of us don't do what we really want to do in our lives because we fear what our parents will say or because we don't want to disappoint them?
Stuff that. They either respect our right to be who we are and express who we are or they can go on their way. Their choice.
This is so important to breaking free of the web of fear, guilt, and the need for approval that dominates so many child-parent relationships and continues long after the child becomes an adult.
They are not our parents, in truth, anyway, except according to Matrix reality. They are the ones who seeded our physical form and with whom we spent our formative years.
They are close by genetics in this physical realm, but they may not be at all close when it comes to vibrational connection. Many are, but they don't have to be.
An obsession with doing nothing to upset our parents or the people around us is the Matrix mentality, a key part of the prison that keeps us in line.
It is the same with our wives or husbands, partners, and children. Observe your own situation.
How many people around you, people you love and care for, are suppressing what you want to do with your life because you are concerned by the way it will make them feel?
It is a mental and emotional Alcatraz. It can turn a relationship into a prison sentence, and a marriage and family into a prison cell. Don't get me wrong here.
I am not talking about being violent because you fancy it, or making their lives miserable for the sake of it.
No, no. I mean to express what you are, say what you think, live your uniqueness, without suppressing yourself because those around you will not like or understand the real you. It means to stop living what they think you should be;
.......the blueprint for what they want you to be; and start being the you that you really are. If they can't handle that, that's their problem and they should find someone else who will suit them better.
And if they can't, and insist that you suppress the real you to suit them, they are unpaid, unaware gatekeepers for the Matrix.
But it goes both ways this. Everyone, or almost everyone, is concerned about their own freedom, but what about the freedom of others?
How many times a day do you impose your will, your reality, on those around you?
I spoke at some financial conferences that were designed to promote "freedom". All you had to do was stand on the stage and talk about freedom and you were sure of wild applause.
But most of those clapping their hands, and the organizations that promoted the conferences, did not want freedom at all. It's the last thing they wanted. They couldn't handle freedom.
Most didn't know what it was and those who had some idea were horrified at its implications.
The organizers were terrified that I would use the "E" word, extraterrestrials. Even the "F" word would have been less life-threatening to them.
They couldn't care less if the extraterrestrial information was true or not. They couldn't care less if anything I said was true or not.
So long as it didn't upset the audience, which the organizations were using and manipulating mercilessly to make their fortune, that was OK.
So long as the people liked what they heard, who gave a shit if it was true?
Once I began to question in my books the existence of Jesus, sections of the audience who had previously given me a standing ovation for exposing the conspiracy, began to demand that I be removed from the speakers list. My crime?
Expressing a different view to theirs.
I am sure many of them are still attending, still being manipulated, and still giving standing ovations to the kind of freedom they really want .......
.......the freedom to hear someone support their own beliefs and the freedom to suppress anyone else who has a different view. In fact, that is the "freedom" that most people want. I observed another financial group based in Arizona, and heard them talk about freedom from the system, freedom of expression, and all the usual stuff they think will pull people into their web.
They said the organization was created to promote freedom when it was merely created to make as much money as possible.
Fine, if that's your thing, but be honest about it and don't bullshit me with tearful, carefully rehearsed, garbage about how you are doing it to free the people. Free your overdraft, more like.
Funnily enough, it turned out to be one of the most dictatorial, vicious, unscrupulous, manipulating organizations you could ever see and awash with monumental purveyors of bullshit.
Both of these "financial" operations and most of their audience are gatekeepers masquerading as promoters of freedom and that, perhaps, makes them the most deluded of all.
The greatest gift we can give our children is the freedom to think for themselves, even if, outrage of outrage, we don't agree with what they believe; to encourage them to question, read, and come to their own conclusions;
.......to respect their right to be different without feeling the need to impose our beliefs because we know best.
Of course, it has to be pointed out when their behavior is unfairly and unpleasantly affecting others, but that's not what I mean here.
I mean to encourage them to free their minds and be open to all possibilities. Far too many parents are more concerned with what their neighbors, friends, and the teachers will think of their children, rather than what the children think of themselves and the world.
We need to set the children free to think the officially unthinkable and question at every turn the officially unquestionable. If we can't set our children free, we fall on our arses at the very first step on the road to global freedom.
In our personal relationships, we need to set each other free of the blueprints for what a relationship must be. We are imprisoned by blueprints and expectations, and who creates the blueprints?
The system, the Matrix, does. Once we have an expectation and a mental design for what constitutes "love", a relationship, or anything at all, we are imprisoned by that thought form.
It becomes the focus from which everything is judged. If the relationship takes another expression we are disappointed;
.......it might be perfect for our personal growth and evolution, but it is outside the blueprint, so it can't be right.
"You don't kiss me and hold my hand like the couple across the street."
Well that's probably because I am not the couple across the street, I am me.
Ironically, blueprint relationships are usually the most fragile and superficial because they are often based on image and posturing rather than substance.
Relationships are everything. The relationships between planets and stars, water and air, hot and cold, thought and energy, are constantly creating and changing the world around us.
Relationships are literally what makes creation possible and human relationships are an expression of this.
It is the main way that we learn and grow, but if blueprint rules are laid down on how relationships should be and the direction they must go, we are immediately building barriers to all other potential experience and, therefore, greater understanding.
The flow of life leads us to what we need to experience and who with, and the flow comes from within ourselves. Once we lay down the way it must be, or else, we are challenging that flow, which may have other plans for us.
This creates a battle between the inner flow and the outer, conscious, blueprint demands, and there is always only one winner in such conflicts.
I love to be hugged and held and operating in harmonious situations, but there is so much more for relationships to offer than the classic blueprints and often the experiences they present to us are not very nice.
But if the love is truly there between two people they can survive and grow enormously from those challenges because whatever happens nothing will break that bond.
True love is not conscious, it is beyond the bounds of the conscious mind. It is also beyond words. I think we have lost touch with what love really is.
Instead we often create an illusion of love and confuse it with purely third-dimensional blueprinting.
Among the New Age mentality, hugging people is part of the persona, the blueprint, the mental and emotional uniform to show that you are a "loving person".
But I have seen many in the New Age hugging people as a public show while saying how much they hate their guts once they have gone.
I have known many relationships of the "kissy, kissy, my little cherub" variety, which, on the surface, have been perfect matches.
"Oh what a wonderful couple, they are so in love, it's obvious, isn't it?"
Yet at the first sign of a problem between them, the relationship falls apart because it is built on sand.
They can't handle it once the blueprint is breached and you also find, talking to them after the break-up, that their lovey-dovey-go-through-the-motions relationship was a cover for the lack of a deep inner connection that nothing could destroy.
I have heard that two people in a relationship should never say goodbye on any occasion without saying "I love you". Really?
Just say it now: "I love you."
See how easy it is?
You don't have to mean it, you don't have to feel it, you just have to say it.
How many people say those words every day, just to get what they want?
And how many don't follow that blueprint, yet feel an enormous love for another person and show it in other ways?
I saw a quote once that said:
"Just because I don't love you the way you want me to doesn't mean that I don't love you with everything I have."
The need to hear "I love you" all the time or experience constant public shows of affection can say more about that person's own insecurity than a statement about another's love for them.
If you had to make a choice, would you rather have a blueprint relationship that collapses when the going gets tough or one of real substance in which you know your partner will be in the trench with you, no matter what, even if they don't say "I love you" every five minutes?
Sometimes you can have both, and that's great if that's what you want, but there are other infinite expressions of love that don't come with a set of rules and regulations.
I was married to Linda for 29 years and although we are no longer husband and wife, we are still very close on a deep level, far beyond the nonsensical idea that to be officially "together" you have to sign a piece of headed notepaper.
We will remain so forever because our mutual and deeply painful experiences since 1991 have exploded all blueprints and expectations into tiny fragments.
She knows I will always be there when needed, no matter what, no matter where, and vice-versa. If it had been a blueprint relationship it would have been over in an instant ten years ago. But it wasn't and it isn't, and that is why it has endured and grown, even though the form it takes may have changed.
The experiences we have endured, shared, and overcome have made us stronger, wiser, more enlightened people.
And, most importantly, more individual people, expressing a far greater inner strength and sense of confidence and respect for who we are.
This has been the whole evolutionary reason for what we have experienced: to make us emotionally stronger and free as our own unique selves without the need to have anyone alongside as an emotional crutch. I leaned on Linda emotionally for a long time. I don't now. She leaned on me. She doesn't now.
We are all being challenged to become whole people and we attract the relationships that help us to do that. Such relationships rarely follow the conditioned blueprints.
It's funny how we utter sparkling truths without realizing in our every-day words and phrases. Like when we talk of our partners as "our other half".
That's what they are for most people, or as much of the "other half" as they can find, anyway. In most relationships, the partner expresses an energy that we have not accessed within ourselves.
This is why opposites can so powerfully attract. The male is balanced by the female, who in turn is balanced by the male, or again, by as much as they can manage.
We are accessing such a fraction of ourselves that we need a partner to make the balance and form some kind of "whole" -our other half.
I wrote earlier about how, when two polarities, male and female, are fused together it creates a third force of fantastic creative potential that can take us vibrationally out of Matrix mode.
For this reason, the Illuminati have worked furiously over thousands of years to keep male and female apart and maintain the duality.
Most relationships do not create the necessary vibrational "wholeness" and fusion to trigger the third force in all its magnificence.
So relationships as we know them today are not a problem to those in control.
In fact, male-female relationships as they are currently perceived are a wonderful tool of the Matrix.
Even two halves becoming one is not the ultimate goal on our Freedom Road .......
.......it is the one becoming one. It is believed by some that the ideal "spiritual" partnership is two polarities becoming one whole with male and female creating the third force when two compatible people come together.
I went along with that for a while, but not any more. It is only half the story.
Two halves becoming one still leaves the two individuals concerned as less than whole people. We are everything.
Just because we live in male bodies doesn't mean we don't have as much potential female energy within us as a woman. At the level of consciousness, we are both male and female.
Just because we live in female bodies doesn't mean we don't have as much potential male energy within us as a man.
But our conditioned roles within the Matrix are designed to pressure the consciousness in a male body to suppress its female aspect -"macho man, big boys don't cry" -l.......
.......and the consciousness in a female body to suppress its male aspect -"little girls play with dolls and big girls look after the kitchen".
What we are being challenged to do here is for all of us to access all of us.
Therefore to become balanced "wholes" within ourselves without the need to find an external "other half".
The third force then manifests within all of us, and relationships are the interaction of two whole people and not two halves seeking external balance.
Those relationships are based on the mutual respect of each partner for the other's wholeness and individuality. If they don't fulfil the blueprint then fine because whole people do not want a relationship with a blueprint.
They want to be with another vibrant, whole, individual, unique, expression of all that is.
And if they don't kiss you at the door or say "I love you" every time they leave your presence then who gives a shit because that is them being them.
It doesn't mean they don't love you in their own unique way. Blueprints are such a foundation of the Matrix and without them one of its key structures would collapse.
Relationships as they are currently perceived, desired, and demanded, serve the Matrix magnificently because they suppress what is necessary for the partners to reach wholeness within themselves.
Once whatever they need to express or experience on that journey starts to affect their partner in ways they don't like, the pressure is applied, internally and externally, to suppress that experience and stay in the prison cell.
If this attitude does not stop, the Matrix will continue to hold together for as long as the attitude prevails.
It will always produce the gatekeeper relationship in which each partner keeps the other in mental and emotional servitude while calling it love and the ideal relationship.
There is another aspect to this crazy little thing called love. People talk about love all the time, but what is it, what does it mean? "Love is never having to say you're sorry" is one definition I have heard.
Yet others think that not saying sorry is a really undesirable trait. So one person's definition of love is another's definition of being unloving. Which one is right?
It depends on your blueprint and the perspective from which you are observing.
There is a different definition of love for almost everyone on the planet and that's because love is indefinable.
It just is and expresses itself in infinite ways, most of which we are not aware of in the Great Illusion. And something else we need to ask:
which level of the person is expressing the love in a relationship?
This physical aspect of us is only a holographic projection into this frequency range by the higher levels of who we are.
Our physical level is the experiencer and the giver of experience. It is not who we are. We are all that exists.
Do we want a relationship with a holographic image according to a conditioned blueprint?
Or one with the multi-dimensional consciousness of our partner, which will always provide the experience -the love -that is necessary to open our hearts and minds to the true magnitude of who we are?
We might not like the experience, but from realms beyond this world, it is given with love because it is what we need to set us free of the illusion.
Do we want the comfortable, predictable, commitment of the cul-de-sac? Or the unpredictable, no guarantees, roller-coaster-ride, the long and winding road that leads us to multi-dimensional freedom?
Those two standpoints will judge a relationship and "love" in very different ways, and from very different wavelengths and universes.
When a partner, parent, child, whoever, gives us an experience we don't like, and does not fulfill our blueprint of someone who loves us, we can get caught in the Matrix big time. How do we grow and evolve? Through experience.
All experience, the good and the bad, the pleasant and the unpleasant. In fact, we grow far more profoundly from the challenges than the easy rides.
So who loves us most on a higher level, where it really matters? Those who present the challenges from which we grow and evolve, or those who fulfill our blueprints for an ideal relationship, look after us, take care of us, and shield us from responsibility and challenge? Mmmm.
Topsy-turvy world, isn't it?
Nothing is what it seems.