THE STRANGE REPTILIAN APPEARANCE OF NOAH
- ParrisVstefanow
- 4 days ago
- 3 min read
Genesis asserts that "Noah found favor with the Lord . . . Noah was a righteous man; he was without blame in that age. Noah walked with God." The only other Patriarch who "walked with God" was Enoch who became deified in his lifetime.
Although Noah was not deified or made divine in the religious literature, his Sumerian counterpart Utnapishtim was made immortal and sent to live with the gods. For some reason the Hebrew priesthood decided not to immortalize Noah.
Like his nephew Melchizedek, Noah was physically different. In the lost Book of Lamech, scraps of which have been recovered in the Dead Sea Scrolls, Noah was so physically different when he was born that Lamech appealed to his father Methuselah, who in turn asked Enoch, whether or not Noah had been conceived by the Nefilim.
Methuselah was told that Noah was not from one of the divine beings but was from his own son Lamech. What then is this physical difference that so disturbed Lamech? Was this the difference that caused such consternation to Noah and his sons after the Deluge?
Genesis 9 makes much of the incident after the Deluge when Noah, drunk from too much wine, collapsed in a drunken stupor in his tent. Ham entered and saw his father naked and told his two brothers, who proceeded to back into the tent with a cloth and covered the naked Noah. Finding out that his son Ham had seen him naked, Noah loses all sense of reason and puts a curse on Ham and his son Canaan.
One wonders about this irrational reaction. Was it because Noah wanted to hide the vestiges of his reptilian past? The sensitivity of Noah in being seen naked can only mean that he bore the "sign of the Nefilim."
Just like his nephew Melchizedek, it may have been a large badge-like area of scaly skin or hide on his chest.
Relations between humans and the Nephilim and their offspring were so severely strained just before the Deluge that open warfare had actually broken out, and any vestige of reptilian ancestry in man was considered to be a "badge of shame." Melchisedek was whisked away by the deity in order to prevent the people from killing him.
As Priest-Kings, the Patriarchs were considered to be allies and friends of the gods, presumably because they themselves were part saurian. Reptile vestiges must have made them easily recognizable; and these characteristics, possibly a patch of scaly skin on the chest or face, or perhaps the remnants of reptilian features on the countenance, would be considered by humans as the so-called "badge of shame." This may have been why Noah was so upset when seen naked by his sons.
[Comment: One would presume that if Cro-Magnon could interbreed with the Saurians in the first place, then this interbreeding is still possible.
(It’s part of that "skin thing" again.) Also it is stated only that the saurian males interbred with the mammalian females. There is no mention of saurian females plotting to secretly "fornicate with" mammalian males. This leads to the thought that the birth-process physical-mechanism would predominate from the female side, since these recorded crossbreeds were born live, like other mammals.
If saurian females interbred with mammalian males, they were obviously more discreet and more selective about it but probably bore their young encased in some sort of egg shell, for final incubation. So, it seems like "boys will be boys," no matter which planet you live on.
#Noah #Melchizedek #Reptilian #TypeOnegative #Bloodlines #BlueBloods #Bible #ReptilianHybrid #Nephilim #RHnegative