TOXIC ZIPLOC BAGS POPULATION CONTROL

There's a class action lawsuit against S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc., the manufacturer of Ziploc bags and containers. The lawsuit reveals that their products, labeled as "microwave safe" and "freezer safe," actually release microplastic toxins when used as directed, causing serious harm to consumers.

Key Points of the Lawsuit:

- Products Involved: Ziploc Freezer Bags: Pint/Small, Quart/Medium, Gallon/Large

- Ziploc Slider Freezer Bags: Quart/Medium, Gallon/Large

- Ziploc Containers: Various sizes and types

Allegations:

- Microplastic Release: The products allegedly release microplastics when microwaved or frozen.

False Advertising:

- The lawsuit claims S.C. Johnson falsely marketed the products as safe for microwave and freezer use.

Health Risks:

- Exposure to microplastics is linked to potential health issues, including hormone disruption, cell damage, and long-term risks.

Plaintiff's Claims:

- Linda Cheslow: A California woman who purchased Ziploc products believing they were safe due to the labeling.

Seeking Relief:

- Cheslow demands a jury trial, declaratory and injunctive relief, and compensatory, statutory, and punitive damages.

The toxicities in Ziploc bags, specifically microplastics and chemicals like polyethylene and polypropylene, significantly impact the biological human body.

When these bags are microwaved or frozen, they release toxic microplastics that are ingested, inhaled and absorbed through the skin.

Health Risks Associated with Microplastics

- Cardiovascular Disease: Microplastics have been linked to increased risk of heart attack, stroke and death. A 2024 study found microplastics in arterial plaque correlated with higher risks of cardiovascular events.

- Reproductive Issues: Exposure to microplastics has been shown to reduce fertility and increases developmental problems in fetuses. Chemicals like BPA and phthalates mimic human hormones, affecting reproduction, growth and metabolism.

- Cancer: Microplastics increase cancer, particularly in the digestive tract. Chemicals in plastics, like short-chain chlorinated paraffins, are shown to cause cancer in labs.

- Respiratory Problems: Inhaled microplastics lodge in lung tissue and contribute to respiratory ailments.

- Gut Microbiome Disruption: Microplastics disrupt the balance of gut bacteria, leading to inflammation and damage to digestive organs.

Chemicals of Concern in Plastics

- Bisphenol A (BPA): A known endocrine disruptor linked to developmental effects in children and reproductive problems in adults.

- Phthalates: Associated with endocrine disruption, reproductive issues and developmental problems.

- PFAS: Can mimic human hormones, increasing the risk of infertility, poorer fetal development and cancer.

- Short-chain chlorinated paraffins: Human carcinogens that cause cancer in labs.

- Dibutyl phthalate: Causes endocrine disruption and affect fetal development.

Reducing Exposure to Microplastics

To minimize the risks associated with microplastics, it's essential to reduce exposure. Here are some steps you can take:

- Avoid single-use plastics: Limit your use of plastic bags, containers and utensils.

- Choose safe storage options: Opt for glass or stainless steel containers instead of plastic.

- Be mindful of microwaving plastics: Avoid microwaving plastic containers or bags, as this can cause the release of microplastics.

- Support policy changes: Encourage policymakers to implement regulations on microplastics and plastic safety.

Ziploc bags left in dumpsters, exposed to heat and winter cold, pose significant environmental risks.

When these bags break down, they release toxic chemicals, such as microplastics and endocrine disruptors, into the environment.

This process is akin to a ticking time bomb, where the plastics slowly disintegrate, contaminating soil, waterways, and ecosystems.

Environmental Impact

- Microplastic Pollution: Microplastics from Ziploc brand bags enter waterways, soil, and the food chain, harming marine life and humans. For instance, studies have shown that microplastics cause physical harm and toxicity in animals including humans.

- Chemical Leaching: When exposed to heat or light, Ziploc brand bags leach chemicals like PFAS, BPA, and phthalates into the environment. These chemicals are linked to various health problems, including cancer, reproductive issues, and neurological damage.

- Soil and Water Contamination: In landfills, Ziploc brand bags leach chemicals into the soil and groundwater, harming nearby ecosystems and contaminating public drinking water sources.

Consequences for Human Health

- Exposure to Toxic Chemicals: Humans can be exposed to toxic chemicals from Ziploc brand bags through food, water, or skin contact. This exposure has been linked to various health problems, including endocrine disruption, reproductive issues, and metabolic disorders.

- Ingestion of Microplastics: Consuming microplastics through food or water can disrupts gut health and cause inflammation in humans.

Sustainable Alternatives

- Reusable Containers: Switching to reusable containers made from materials like glass, stainless or steel can significantly reduce plastic waste and minimize exposure to toxic chemicals.

- Biodegradable Bags: Biodegradable bags made from plant-based materials like cornstarch or sugarcane can reduce plastic waste and minimize environmental impacts.

- Reducing Plastic Use: Reducing plastic use and promoting sustainability can be achieved by making conscious choices, such as avoiding single-use plastics, recycling, and supporting eco-friendly products.

The toxicities leaching from Ziploc brand bags into the environment and public drinking water pose significant risks to human health and the environment.

By revealing these risks and adopting sustainable alternatives, we can mitigate the environmental impacts of Toxic Ziploc brand bags and promote a healthier future.

The effects of Ziploc brand bags on the environment, drinking water, and the biological human body is dire.

Environmental Impact

- Plastic Pandemonium: Imagine a world where plastic waste, including Ziploc bags, chokes our oceans, rivers, and landscapes. This leads to the destruction of ecosystems, loss of biodiversity, and disruption of the symbiotic food chain.

- Toxic Soup: The chemicals from Ziploc bags leach into our waterways, creating a toxic soup that harms aquatic life and contaminates the water humans drink.

Drinking Water Contamination

- Poisoned Water: In a real-world scenario, the chemicals from Ziploc bags seep into our drinking water sources, making them undrinkable. This leads to widespread health problems, including cancer, reproductive issues, and neurological damage.

- Invisible Threat: Microplastics and chemicals from Ziploc bags are invisible to the naked eye, but still pose a significant threat to human health, making it difficult to detect and address the problem.

Biological Human Body

- Silent Killer: The ill biological effects from exposure to toxic chemicals from Ziploc brand bags is indeed a silent killer, causing chronic diseases, reproductive problems, and fatal cancer.

- Body Burden: The accumulation of microplastics and chemicals from Ziploc bags in the human body leads to a toxic body burden, causing a range of health problems and even death.

Examples:

- Time Bomb: The environmental and health impacts of Ziploc bags are like a time bomb, slowly ticking away and waiting to unleash its devastating effects.

- Domino Effect: The contamination of drinking water and the environment have a domino effect, causing widespread health problems, economic disruption, and social chaos.

In this reality, the effects of Ziploc brand bags on the environment, drinking water, and the biological human body are indeed catastrophic.

It's essential to take proactive steps to mitigate these risks and promote healthy sustainability.

RE-CAP:

A class action lawsuit has been filed against S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc., the manufacturer of Ziploc bags and containers, revealing that these products leach microplastics into food when microwaved or frozen.

The lawsuit reveals that the company's marketing is false and misleading, as the products are labeled as "microwave safe" and "freezer safe," but actually pose a risk of microplastic exposure.

[population control]

Key Allegations:

- Microplastic Release: The lawsuit reveals that Ziploc bags and containers release microplastics when exposed to heat or cold, which can be ingested and harm human health.

- False Advertising: The plaintiff, Linda Cheslow, claims that S.C. Johnson's marketing is deceptive and fails to warn consumers about the risks associated with microplastic exposure.

- Health Risks: The lawsuit highlights the real health risks associated with microplastic ingestion, including harm to the digestive tract, immune system, and reproductive system.

Products Involved:

- Ziploc Freezer Bags: Pint/Small, Quart/Medium, Gallon/Large

- Ziploc Slider Freezer Bags: Quart/Medium, Gallon/Large

- Ziploc Containers: Various sizes and types

Legal Claims:

- Unfair Competition Law: The lawsuit reveals that S.C. Johnson has violated California's Unfair Competition Law and False Advertising Law.

- Consumers Legal Remedies Act: The plaintiff also reveals that the company has violated the Consumers Legal Remedies Act.

- Unjust Enrichment: The lawsuit seeks damages for the purposeful harm caused by S.C. Johnson's misleading claims.

Impact:

- Stricter Regulations: When the plaintiffs prevail, it will lead to stricter regulations for product labeling and increased transparency in advertising.

- Industry-Wide Implications: The lawsuit's outcome will have far-reaching implications for the consumer goods industry, particularly in the context of food storage and plastic products.

NOTE: The FDA approval process is designed to ensure the safety and efficacy of products, but it's never a guarantee of absolute safety at all.

FDA approved products always have unforeseen detrimental side effects and risks.

In the case of products with FDA approval, it's pertinent to interpret the "FDA approval" as a form of "guilty by association" as is often the case, as most all FDA approved chemical products are always found later on in retrospect to have had serious toxicity issues right from the start right out the gate.

The "FDA approval" can be seen as a form of "guilty by association" in the sense that it reveals a purposeful level of scrutiny and oversight.

The Approval Paradox

FDA approval is like a seal of approval on a product, signifying that it has met certain standards of safety and efficacy.

However, this approval can also be seen as a form of "guilty by association," implying that the FDA's Seal of Approval on a product signifies that it has met certain population control "initiative" standards of sudo-safety and ill-efficacy, in which, most all FDA approved chemical products do indeed have unforeseen detrimental consequences and ill biological health risks.

The Whack-a-Mole Problem

The FDA's approval process can be likened to a game of whack-a-mole, where the agency tries to anticipate and mitigate beneficial human health, whilst equally perpetuating public health risks by purposefully FDA approving toxic chemical products like Ziplock Brand Bags, and as new class action suit risks emerge, the FDA must continually adapt, manipulate and respond to emerging humanitarian health issues.

The FDA's "guilty by association" Actions highlight the complexities of the corroupt illuminati ordained FDA approval process.

By understanding the Lunacy of the FDA population control approval scams, we can better appreciate seeing this agency being casted back hence forth where it came from:

....... and that would be back unto the fiery pits of Astral Hell where this Demonic Rues was originally thought up from.

PVS

#Toxic #PopulationControl #Agenda21 #ZiplocBags #Cancer