MATRIX GATEKEEPERS SCIENTISTS
- ParrisVstefanow
- 2 days ago
- 5 min read
The foundations of "science" were created by the Francis Bacon-inspired Royal Society in London.
This "science" claims that we come from oblivion, have a short physical "life", and then return to oblivion. Even by its own official history the Royal Society was created by Freemasons -people like the Illuminati agent, Benjamin Franklin.
Another inspiration was Isaac Newton, a Grand Master of that elite Illuminati secret society, the Priory of Sion, which manipulates on behalf of the Merovingian bloodline.
Newton, like the founders of the Royal Society, knew that much of what official "science" tells us to be true is utter garbage. But that was the idea, to sell us a lie to keep us from the truth.
It is far easier to control people if they believe they are cosmic accidents, who come into existence merely by chemical reactions and then go back to oblivion at death.
It is much harder to control those who are aware of their multi-dimensional infinity.
Also, what better way to hide the fact that we are controlled from another density than to have people believe there are no other densities?
The scientist, like the law, has become a "god", who is given free reign to pontificate about the great questions because he is a scientist and therefore he should know.
Modern scientists are mostly babes-in-arms when it comes to understanding the nature of life and existence, and yet they arrogantly insist that only they know best.
Worse, anyone inside or outside of their closed order who questions their norms is subjected to hate campaigns of ridicule and vilification.
Virtually every major scientific breakthrough, including the Earth being a sphere, was first greeted with laugher, anger, or denial, by the "scientists" of the day.
Science is a fascist club in which all members must stay in line or have their funding and reputation destroyed.
When Immanuel Velikovsky published his books on the devastation he said was caused by the Venus "walk-about", he was castigated beyond belief because he dared to question the norm of conditioned "scientific" orthodoxy.
The leading "experts" bombarded his publishers with letters full of bile and vitriol saying they would boycott the company if they did not withdraw Velikovsky's book.
As the company was a publisher of official "scientific" textbooks, it once again put bucks before backbone and the rights were passed to another publisher.
The assistant editor who suggested publishing Velikovsky's book was sacked. All this happened because a different view to the scientific norm was presented for people to see.
John A. Keel wrote:
"In retrospect many of the anti-Velikovsky critiques read like the work of deranged lunatics who had not even bothered to read the book they were attempting to criticise.
They were against the book simply because it propounded ideas that were contrary to the accepted theories of the day .
Above all they resented the fact that the book was very well written (most scientists are miserable writers)."
Alfred Wegener, a German meteorologist, died in 1930 after 15 years of ridicule, slander, and contempt from his peers and colleagues.
His crime? Suggesting that the Earth once consisted of two landmasses, which split and drifted apart over vast periods of time to form the continents.
He supported this proposal with much evidence, but because he was challenging the official "norm" he paid with an onslaught of character assassination. We call his theory today "Continental Drift".
The theme of what he said was correct!
As Max Planck said:
"A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it."
What passes for science is a sick joke.
Most of its efforts are not aimed at answering the big questions of existence because there is little money or sponsorship in that.
Science is geared to finding a new drug or industrial technique that will generate a fortune for its funders. It's a money-making machine and not inspired by an open-minded spirit of discovery.
As a Congressional Committee established as far back as the 1950s, those funders of "scientific" research in US universities, the tax-exempt foundations like the Rockefeller Foundation, were dictating what the outcome of that research would be before it had even started!!
Without such an agreement, the funding was not handed over (see ...And The Truth Shall Set You Free).
This policy is to suppress an undesired outcome because, in Carl Sagan's words:
"All inquiries carry with them some element of risk. There is no guarantee that the universe will conform to our predispositions."
The whole "scientific" system is structured to suppress knowledge, not advance it, because the Illuminati is desperate for us to remain in ignorance of who we are and the nature of life.
If enough people knew the truth, their game would be up.
Scientists, and their offshoot, the medical profession, are some of the most concrete-minded of the gatekeepers.
They are also some of the most important because they suppress the nature of multi-dimensional existence and that is guaranteed to keep us in the Matrix.
They are feted as experts and yet they are, like so many teachers, journalists, and politicians, astonishingly uninformed.
Their whole structure is designed to keep them compartmentalized in their "specialty" so they are partial masters of one trade and jack of none.
Only when we connect the dots can we begin to see the picture, but most scientists spend their entire careers specializing on one dot.
In the UK, one of the most infamous gatekeepers in my experience is one Dr Susan Blackmore, who is constantly wheeled out by the media to dismiss any claims of the "paranormal".
The more that people experience such phenomena, the more ludicrous Dr Blackmore's "explanations" become .
But, of course, because she is an "academic" with a title she is seen as more credible than the people actually having the experience.
In the New Scientist magazine of November 4th 2000, she was again given the freedom to rubbish all other scientists who say the mind and brain are not the same thing.
The arrogance with which her padlocked mind dismisses anything outside the official "scientific" norm is a wonder to behold.
We, the people, are the only ones who can break this stranglehold on true science. We need to stop being impressed by titles and letters after someone's name and focus purely on the evidence.
We are encouraged to believe that a scientist must know better than a "layman" by definition. He's a scientist, isn't he?
The track record of scientists talking complete cobblers is simply enormous and goes back to the very start of the "scientific method".
An official report in the UK exposed how government "scientists" and "experts" had misled the British public for years about the so-called mad cow disease being transmitted to humans through eating beef.
The scientists said it could not be passed to humans and so safety measures were not taken when any idiot could see that the chances were high that it could.
I remember saying so on a BBC farming programme in 1989 when I was a spokesman for the British Green Party. But the scientists knew best and people are still dying today as a result.
Was it a layman or woman who came up with Thalidomide that led to so many fundamentally deformed babies?
No, it was scientists who said it was perfectly safe. It would take a library to list all of the horrors that have resulted from these "experts" we call "scientists".
But the masses go on believing them without question and, until we stop, the Matrix will remain unexposed to the vast majority.
The motto of the new and true science should be the words of Albert Schweitzer:
"...those who sincerely seek the truth should not fear the outcome".