THE PLANDEMIC STARTED THE GENETIC TRANSFORMATION OF HUMANITY

The 'Pandemic' was never just about a virus and a "vaccine". It was the first mass-scale application of synthetic biology to the human condition .

As such, it transitioned theoretical Convergence science into applied science but on a global scale.

For a world that mostly never heard of Transhumanism, they have arbitrarily been placed on the conveyor belt of transformation.

As Spartacus concludes:

"There needs to be a public conversation about synthetic biology and neurotechnology, right now, and there need to be policies enacted that strictly define international and binding limits for its use.

If not, then the human beings of the future will inevitably be reduced to engineered products."

This is not a joke. It is not a drill. Humanity is on the brink of losing what it means to be human.

When Klaus Schwab talks about how the Fourth Industrial Revolution is going to change YOU, he means exactly that:

- chemically

- biologically

- physically

But, he is only pointing to the mad science practitioners who are advancing synthetic biology in relative anonymity.

Private-Public Partnerships

for Mad Science.

The ongoing plot

to reengineer humanity.

Klaus Schwab said something recently that got people's hackles up.

"Artificial Intelligence (AI), but not only artificial intelligence, but also, the metaverse, near-space technologies, and I could go on and on."

"Synthetic Biology".

"Our life in ten years from now, will be completely different, very much affected, and who masters those technologies, in some way, will be the master of the world."

He's not wrong.

People get pissed off when they hear statements like master of the world because they think it's an empty threat;

....... little more than the idle bluster of a megalomaniac.

It most certainly isn't.

The reason why people don't see what this technology is capable of is because,

for one thing, they aren't cursed with an overactive imagination

for another;

....... they aren't used to holistic systems, thinking

lastly, there has been next to no mainstream media coverage of synthetic biology;

....... because if there was, people would rightly be having a conniption fit.

I'm going to ask you something that may strike you as a little bit strange.

What is an internal organ?

The textbook answer is something along the lines of specialized tissue in the body that performs a specific function.

But what if I told you that an internal organ can be whatever the heck we want it to be?

RSC - A morpho-space for synthetic organs and organoids - The possible and the actual Source Efforts in evolutionary developmental biology have shed light on how organs are developed and why evolution has selected some structures instead of others.

These advances in the understanding of organogenesis along with the most recent techniques of organotypic cultures, tissue bioprinting and synthetic biology provide the tools to hack the physical and genetic constraints in organ development;

....... thus opening new avenues for research in the form of completely designed or merely altered settings.

Here we propose a unifying framework that connects the concept of morpho-space (i.e. the space of possible structures) with synthetic biology and tissue engineering.

We aim for a synthesis that incorporates our understanding of both evolutionary and architectural constraints and can be used as a guide for exploring alternative design principles to build artificial organs and organoids.

We present a three-dimensional morpho-space incorporating three key features associated to organ and organoid complexity.

The axes of this space include the degree of complexity introduced by developmental mechanisms required to build the structure, its potential to store and react to information and the underlying physical state.

We suggest that a large fraction of this space is empty, and that the void might offer clues for alternative ways of designing and even inventing new organs.

What if the organs found in humans and animals - kidneys, spleen, liver, heart, brain, et cetera, do not represent all possible configurations of cells, but only the narrowly defined ones selected by evolution?

What if there is a giant unexamined blank spot where you can have things like thinking muscle tissue chock-full of neurons, or an all-in-one liver and kidney (lidney?) right under your skin that makes you sweat filtered toxins out?

What if we could manufacture entirely new organs from scratch that never existed in nature before and have completely novel functions?

What if a guy could have little brains implanted in every joint in his body and give his arms and legs a mind of their own, like an octopus?

This is something that has been explored in science fiction numerous times, in the past.

In Warhammer 40,000, the highly augmented and superhuman Space Marines are implanted with numerous scratch-built organs;

....... and if you've ever read Bacigalupi's The Windup Girl or the late Greg Bear's Blood Music, then you know exactly how bizarre this sort of thing can get.

There's just one problem, here, and it's that this stuff is getting alarmingly close to not being science fiction anymore, and there are basically no ethical frameworks in place to make sure it isn't horribly abused.

This is just one example of what you can do with synthetic biology.

Another thing you can do is design completely new enzymes from scratch, insert the genes coding for them into bacteria, and use them as reagents to produce entirely new compounds.

Still not convinced?

If you go on the Government of Canada's website, right now, this below article, is one of the articles (Exploring Biodigital Convergence) they have up.

I recommend archiving it.

Policy Horizons Canada - Exploring Biodigital Convergence

Source

[smart city life]

I wake up to the sunlight and salty coastal air of the Adriatic sea.

I don't live anywhere near the Mediterranean, but my AI, which is also my health advisor, has prescribed a specific air quality, scent, and solar intensity to manage my energy levels in the morning, and has programmed my bedroom to mimic this climate.

The fresh bed sheets grown in my building from regenerating fungi are better than I imagined; I feel rested and ready for the day.

I need to check a few things before I get up. I send a brain message to open the app that controls my insulin levels and make sure my pancreas is optimally supported.

I can't imagine having to inject myself with needles like my mother did when she was a child. Now it's a microbe transplant that auto adjusts and reports on my levels.

Everything looks all right, so I check my brain's digital interface to read the dream data that was recorded and processed in real time last night.

My therapy app analyzes the emotional responses I expressed while I slept.

It suggests I take time to be in nature this week to reflect on my recurring trapped-in-a-box dream and enhance helpful subconscious neural activity.

My AI recommends a "forest day".

I think "okay", and my AI and neural implant do the rest.

I touched on this in the last Spartacast, but I don't think I really got the point across.

Biotech and information technology are completely intertwined, and they have been for decades, now.

Anyone remember Folding@home, where people used their PlayStations to contribute processor power to a distributed supercomputer network?

That was back in 2007, and the actual software client itself has existed since 2000.

They do everything on a computer, now.

The whole idea behind mRNA vaccines is basically to digitize vaccines by reducing them to synthetic gene sequences and using human cells as bioreactors to make the actual protein;

....... skipping over a bunch of manufacturing steps.

Okay, so you have CRISPR.

You have DREADDs.

You have nanotransducers.

PVS:

1. CRISPR: CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats) is a gene-editing tool that allows scientists to edit DNA sequences with unprecedented precision. It works like a pair of molecular scissors, cutting DNA at specific points and enabling researchers to add, remove, or modify genes. CRISPR has revolutionized fields like genetics, biotechnology, and medicine, with potential applications in treating genetic diseases, developing new therapies, and improving crop yields.

2. DREADDs: DREADDs (Designer Receptors Exclusively Activated by Designer Drugs) are a type of chemogenetic tool used to manipulate specific cells or neurons in the body. They consist of engineered receptors that respond to specific ligands or drugs, allowing researchers to activate or silence cells with high precision. DREADDs have been widely used in neuroscience research to study neural circuits, behavior, and disease models. They also hold promise for therapeutic applications, such as treating neurological disorders or pain management.

3. Nanotransducers: Nanotransducers are devices that convert energy from one form to another at the nanoscale. In the context of biotech and neurotech, nanotransducers can be used to interface with cells or neurons, converting biological signals into electrical signals or vice versa. They can be used for applications like neural prosthetics, brain-computer interfaces, or biosensing. Nanotransducers can be made from various materials, including nanoparticles, nanowires, or graphene, and are being explored for their potential in medical diagnostics, therapeutics, and research.

These technologies have the potential to revolutionize various fields, from medicine and biotechnology to neuroscience and beyond. However, they also raise important questions about ethics, safety, and responsible development.

Ethics, Safety, and Responsible Development Questions:

1. How can CRISPR be used responsibly to avoid unintended consequences or mosaicism?

2. What safeguards are needed to prevent misuse of DREADDs for mind control or coercion?

3. How can nanotransducers be designed to ensure biocompatibility and minimize risk of adverse reactions?

- NOTE: Mosaicism refers to the presence of two or more different cell populations within the same individual or tissue, often resulting from genetic mutations or variations that occur during development. In the context of CRISPR gene editing, mosaicism can be a concern because the editing process might not affect all cells uniformly, leading to a mixture of edited and unedited cells. This can impact the efficacy and safety of gene therapies, as some cells may not be corrected or may develop unintended consequences. Researchers are working to better understand and mitigate mosaicism in gene editing applications.

Examples in a Totalitarian Smart City include:

1. Biometric Surveillance: Nanotransducers are used to monitor citizens' vital signs, tracking their physical and emotional states in real-time.

Analogy: A city-wide, implantable chip tracking system, similar to RFID tracking tags in pets.

2. Genetic Engineering: CRISPR is used to "enhance" citizens' traits, such as intelligence or obedience, under the guise of "public health."

Analogy: A government-mandated genetic "upgrade" program, akin to "a software update for humans".

3. Neural Control: DREADDs is used to manipulate citizens' thoughts and actions, suppressing dissent and opposition.

Analogy: A neural " kill switch" that is activated remotely, similar to shutting down a robot.

4. Predictive Policing: Nanotransducers are used to monitor citizens' brain activity, predicting and preventing potential crimes.

Analogy: A Minority Report-style system, using brain-computer interfaces to anticipate and prevent crimes.

5. Public Health Monitoring: CRISPR could be used to "cure" diseases, but also to monitor and control citizens' health.

Analogy: A mandatory, genetically-engineered "vaccine" program, with side effects monitored and controlled by the government.[sound familiar?]

6. Smart City Infrastructure: Nanotransducers are integrated into buildings and infrastructure, monitoring and controlling citizens' interactions with the environment.

Analogy: A smart city-wide, sensor-driven "Internet of Things" that tracks and responds to citizens' every move.

7. Citizen Ranking: DREADDs is used to monitor citizens' behavior and assign them a "social score," influencing their access to resources and services.

Analogy: A social credit system, similar to China's Social Credit System, but with neural interfaces.

8. Neural Advertising: Nanotransducers are used to deliver targeted, neural-level advertising, influencing citizens' purchasing decisions.

Analogy: A subliminal advertising system, but with direct neural interfaces.

9. Thought Crime Detection: DREADDs are used to detect and suppress "subversive" thoughts or ideas.

Analogy: A thought police force, using neural interfaces to monitor and control citizens' thoughts.

10. Population Control: CRISPR could be used to manipulate citizens' reproductive choices, controlling population growth and demographics.

Analogy: A government-mandated family planning program, but with genetic engineering and strict control "initiatives".

These examples illustrate the applications of these technologies in a totalitarian smart city.] PVS: end.

You have the ability to create engineered amyloids, like Ehud Gazit's amyloid semiconductors.

You have even more than that, too.

Theres even a paper on implementing an entire von Neumann architecture in nothing but lipid nanoparticles.

Science Advances - Nanoparticle-based computing architecture for nanoparticle neural networks

The lack of a scalable nanoparticle-based computing architecture severely limits the potential and use of nanoparticles for manipulating and processing information with molecular computing schemes.

Inspired by the von Neumann architecture (VNA), in which multiple programs can be operated without restructuring the computer;

....... we realized the nanoparticle-based VNA (NVNA) on a lipid chip for multiple executions of arbitrary molecular logic operations in the single chip without refabrication.

In this system, nanoparticles on a lipid chip function as the hardware that features memory, processors, and output units, and DNA strands are used as the software to provide molecular instructions for the facile programming of logic circuits.

NVNA enables a group of nanoparticles to form a feed-forward neural network, a perceptron, which implements functionally complete Boolean logic operations, and provides a programmable;

....... resettable, scalable computing architecture and circuit board to form nanoparticle neural networks and make logical decisions.

What happens if we integrate all of these disparate ideas together into a single platform?

What could we create?

Could we inject someone with a substance that generates wirelessly manipulated smart tissues in someone's body?

Think about it.

Let's say we use mRNA to produce Yamanaka factors in someone's cells to turn them into stem cells in vivo, and then, let's say we spliced new genes into those cells to generate an entirely new, synthetic cell line with entirely novel functionality.

NOTE: Yamanaka factors are four

specific genes that play a crucial

role in cellular reprogramming

and stem cell research. These

factors, discovered by Shinya

Yamanaka in 2006, enable the

transformation of differentiated

cells back into a pluripotent

state, where they can develop

into any cell type in the body.

Then, let's say these collections of cells were coaxed into performing specific tasks by manipulating their membrane potential with nanotechnology, or by using chemogenetics.

What if these cells migrated throughout the body, divided, and formed colonies, like a symbiotic organism, all while evading the immune system by giving off signals identical to human cells?

What if these cells could be made to secrete neurotransmitters or hormones into the extracellular space to manipulate the functions of the subject's normal cells?

What if they could be used to construct tissue scaffolds around the subject's existing organs and manipulate or monitor their function, through extracellular matrix remodeling?

These are just a couple hypothetical examples.

There are many more possible implementations, here, including using tissue engineering to make entirely new, 3D-printed "cybernetic" organs.

Soldiers in the future might not wear gas masks at all.

Why bother, when they've all been implanted with an organ that instantly secretes atropine the moment they get a whiff of VX;

....... or when their acetylcholine receptors have been completely altered to resist binding by organophosphates?

What if intelligence officers all had 200 IQ and perfect recall because their neural lace links their brains together into a hive mind with a bunch of printed brains in vats?

These sorts of questions, and many more, are being asked in top military think tanks like DARPA in the US and others in Russia and China.

Nobody wants to lose strategic surprise by being the one country that didn't make supermen in time for World War III.

DARPA knows that China's track record for ethics is extremely poor, and that it's likely that they're engaging in human experimentation behind the scenes.

That tempts our own leaders to do the same (and, indeed, they are).

That's not all you can do with synthetic biology:

- assassinations without the possibility for attribution

- debilitating specific people by inducing chronic health issues

- destroying enemy agriculture with novel plant pathogens

- engineering scratch-made viruses and bacteria to produce hyper-lethal bioweapons

- engineering obedience and docility into people by altering the balance of androgens and neurotransmitters in their bodies to blunt aggression and drive for reward

....... the list can go on and on.

When Klaus Schwab says that "those who master these technologies will master the world", if anything, he is underselling it.

With these technologies, you could re-engineer an entire species - including humans - into something completely different. [again, sound familiar?]

I cannot stress this enough.

There needs to be a public conversation about synthetic biology and neurotechnology, right now, and there need to be policies enacted that strictly define international and binding limits for its use.

If not, then the human beings of the future will inevitably be reduced to transhumanistic bioengineered engineered products.

The technocrats behind all of this are anti-personalists.

They see no value in the person per se, the person itself.

Only the NWO collective good matters to them.

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy - Personalism

Personalists regard personhood (or "personality") as the fundamental notion, as that which gives meaning to all of reality and constitutes its supreme value.

Personhood carries with it an inviolable dignity that merits unconditional respect.

Personalism has for the most part not been primarily a theoretical philosophy of the person.

Although it does defend a unique theoretical understanding of the person, this understanding is in itself such as to support the prioritization of practical or moral philosophy;

....... while at the same time the moral experience of the person is such as to decisively determine the theoretical understanding.

For personalists, a person combines subjectivity and objectivity, causal activity and receptivity, unicity and relation, identity and creativity.

Stressing the moral nature of the person, or the person as the subject and object of free activity, personalism tends to focus on practical, moral action and ethical questions.

Human beings are regarded by the agents of the NWO as resource-hungry, tribalistic, and aggressive.

Basically, an invasive nuisance species.

All it would take is for one panel of bioethicists [who, cdc, wef] to decide,

"Gee, civilization sure would be better if we engineered the capacity for crime, aggressive behavior, bigotry, and fanaticism out of humans."

Then, before you know it, one day, [today] people line up for their "vaccines", and years later, they start having kids that are more carpenter ant than human;

....... utterly incapable of personhood, of the intrinsically valuable experience of becoming a man or woman.

People still think this is just about a virus or a vaccine.

It's not .

Much, much more than that is at stake here, more than most can even fathom.

https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia3/ciencia_transhumanism109.htm

#Indoctrination #mrna #Transhuman #IoT #OperationWarpSpeed #SARSCoV2 #IOB #Graphene #GrapheneOxide #Nanotechnology #InternetOfThings #InternetOfBodies #GeneTherapy #covid19 #BioWeapon #PopulationControl #Agenda21 #Vaccines #Cancer #Genocide #CRISPR #DREADDS #Mrna #BiometricInternalSurveillance #SmartCity #MindControl