THE VACCINATED SPREADING NANOTECH AND SPIKE PROTEINS TO THE UNVACCINATED

Officially: The COVID-19 mRNA vaccine's protection wanes over time, making constant booster shots necessary to maintain immunity.

The virus's rapid mutations also require updated boosters to address new variants.

This is similar to annual flu shots, which update protection against changing flu viruses.

Unofficially:

Biometric tracking in mrna vaccines enables monitoring of human behavior, location, and physiological responses.

Boosters update software, ensuring continued surveillance and authoritarian control.

This maintains a totalitarian grip, enforcing obedience and suppressing dissent.

The human body has a natural ability to heal, but the mRNA vaccine alters cells, making it unlikely if the body can ever fully recover without boosters.

Research now suggests that mRNA effects are irreversible.

MRNA vaccine effects are irreversible due to gene editing, permanent changes to immune cells, and DNA alterations. The full extent of these effects is still being researched and debated as those who took the covid mrna vaccines are the walking human trial guinea pigs for the World Health Organization.

The mRNA vaccine's genetic material enters cells, instructing them to produce spike proteins.

This triggers an immune response, and also leads to permanent gene editing, altered immune cells, and DNA changes, making most effects irreversible.

MRNA spike proteins can transfer through sex.

Research has proved that mRNA nano-particles can be detected in bodily fluids, including semen and vaginal secretions, and the risks and implications are starting to becoming ever so clear.

This phenomenon of mRNA nano-particles being detected in bodily fluids, including semen and vaginal secretions is called "shedding" or "transmission" of mRNA nano-particles.

Proven research has shown that mRNA nano-particles can be detected in bodily fluids, including semen and vaginal secretions, and then be transfer, sexually or otherwise, to unvaccinated individuals through close contact.

If spike proteins are transmitted to an unvaccinated person, it causes symptoms, inflammation, and immune system activation.

The person will experience flu-like symptoms, fatigue, and severe reactions, similar to vaccine side effects.

Severe reactions include:

- anaphylaxis

- myocarditis

- blood clotting

- neurological disorders

- autoimmune diseases

- and organ damage

Symptoms may also involve respiratory distress, cardiac arrest, and even death.

These reactions can be debilitating and life-threatening.

Again, if an unvaccinated person has sex with a vaccinated person, they are exposed to spike proteins, which cause severe reactions, including anaphylaxis, myocarditis, blood clotting, and even death.

The transfer of nanotechnology from the vaccinated to the unvaccinated through sex can cause symptoms.

Nanoparticles in the vaccine with graphene oxide can be transmitted, leading to inflammation, immune system activation, and other severe reactions.

In one account, a doctor had a unvaccinated male patient.

The doctor shared a case of an unvaccinated male patient of his who had sex with a vaccinated female;

....... and contracted spike proteins and nanotech from her mRNA vaccine through shedding.

The male patient mentioned that after the sexual encounter he immediately felt a noticeably difference in his body and began to get constantly sick.

The unvaccinated male patient claimed that after getting spike protein nanotech from the sexual encounter with a vaccinated woman;

....... the only thing that helped him was Ivermectin.

It was like using a virus scanner [ivermectin ] to remove malware [mrna spike protein contamination] from a computer [the human body].

Ivermectin is an anti-parasitic drug that helped the unvaccinated man recover from spike protein nanotech exposure.

It's like a pesticide that targets and neutralizes harmful invaders, allowing the body to heal.

The man took Ivermectin, which bound to the spike proteins, inhibiting their replication and reducing inflammation.

It cleared all symptoms, like a cleaning crew removing toxic waste, helping to restore the body's health and balance.

Comparing nanotech from mRNA vaccines to STDs like AIDS or herpes reveals similarities in transmission and risk.

Both can be spread through intimate contact, and both pose risks to the humanity.

The nanotech analogy is like a computer virus, while the vaccine's impact is like a Trojan horse, both allowing foreign entities to breach the body's defenses.

NOTE:

A bar encounter Sexual “Affair” can be like playing Russian roulette with your health. In a bar, an unvaccinated man meets a vaccinated woman, both inebriated.

With their judgment impaired, they have sex.

He gets infected with mRNA nanotech spike proteins.

It's like downloading malware onto your computer, except it's your body.

The biological risks far outweigh the sexual rewards.

He's now a ticking time bomb, facing unknown health consequences.

Was a one-night stand worth it?

No, his health and well-being are too valuable to gamble with.

NOTE: Dead skin cells from the vaccinated with nanotech contamination is transmitted through the air as “dust”

……. and can transmit the spike proteins. Inhaling or touching the eyes can contract it. This highlights the risks of nanotech shedding and transmission through dead skin cells and other bodily fluids.

EXAMPLE:

In a classy restaurant, a vaccinated world renowned chef prepares his culinary food by hand, without gloves, contaminating dishes with spike protein nanotech.

Unvaccinated diners consume the tainted food, risking infection.

Like a silent contagion, the spike proteins spreads through the chefs prepared food from direct hand contact, transmitting spike proteins from one person to another compromising diners' health.

EXAMPLE:

At Walmart, an unvaccinated woman shops and checks out in a check-out line with a vaccinated cashier ringing up her consumer goods and food.

The vaccinated cashier contaminates her products and cash with spike protein nanotech.

Like a Wi-Fi signal transmitting data between devices;

....... hand contact between the vaccinated cashier touching all her food whilst ringing her out at the check-out line;

....... and the unvaccinated lady at home re-handling the contaminated store items to place away;

....... transfer's the cashiers spike protein contamination through “shedding” to the unvaccinated.

The vaccinated cashier's touch contaminates the woman's products with shedding dead skin cells with nanotech on her health and beauty aids, and money.

Like a drop of ink spreading in water, the spike protein nanotech spreads through touch, infecting the woman, her family, and belongings, creating a web of contamination.

EXAMPLE:

An unvaccinated man visits a massage parlor and chooses a vaccinated female masseuse.

During the massage, she contaminates him with spike protein nanotech through skin contact;

....... like a drop of oil spreading on skin. The man leaves, unaware he's been infected with spike protein contamination from the vaccinated masseuse.

The man returns home, unknowingly bringing the spike protein nanotech with him.

He touches his belongings, food, and family members, spreading the contamination, like a chain reaction, affecting those around him and creating a web of infection.

EXAMPLE:

Vaccinated people can contaminate Halloween candy with spike protein nanotech, like pollen spreading on flowers.

Unvaccinated children eat the candy handled by the vaccinated, getting infected.

Parents are left wondering why their kids are sick, unaware of the nanotech exposure.

Here are five more scenarios to learn from:

1. Vaccinated hairdresser works on unvaccinated clients, touching their hair and scalp, risking nanotech contamination.

2. Vaccinated gym staff handle equipment, spreading spike proteins to unvaccinated members.

3. Vaccinated nurse provides care to unvaccinated patients, risking exposure to nanotech.

4. Vaccinated Door Dash or Uber Eats food delivery drivers handle orders, contaminating food with spike proteins.

5. Vaccinated students sit near unvaccinated peers in school, risking airborne nanotech transmission.

NOTE:

Ivermectin's success against graphene oxide and COVID-19 is attributed to its ability to bind and neutralize graphene oxide, reducing its toxicity.

Its antiparasitic and anti-inflammatory properties also help combat COVID-19 by inhibiting viral replication and modulating the immune response.

Oil of oregano [like ivermectin] has antiparasitic and anti-inflammatory properties.

Its active compound, carvacrol, can help neutralize graphene oxide and combat COVID-19 by inhibiting viral replication and reducing inflammation. It's a natural alternative with similar benefits.

Ivermectin is a synthetic medication made from a natural compound called avermectin, derived from the bacteria Streptomyces avermitilis. It's typically available as a pill or injection, and its chemical formula is C48H74O14.

In summary we've discussed various scenarios where unvaccinated individuals risk exposure to spike protein nanotech from vaccinated people.

These situations included:

- Intimate Sexual contact

- Sharing Food and Drinks

- Touching contaminated surfaces

- and using shared equipment

We also explored scenarios like a chef contaminating food, a cashier infecting customers, and a masseuse spreading nanotech through skin contact.

In each scenario, spike proteins and nanotech can spread like a chain reaction, infecting others and creating a web of contamination.

Our conversation highlighted the importance of awareness and caution in preventing the spread of spike protein nanotech.

In conclusion, our scenarios highlight the risks of spike protein nanotech transmission shedding from the vaccinated to unvaccinated individuals through various means, emphasizing the importance of awareness, caution, and responsible behavior to prevent further contamination.

Ivermectin, a potent antidote, counteracts spike protein nanotech protecting against contamination.

Like a fire extinguisher dousing flames, Ivermectin neutralizes the threat.

However, totalitarian governments, seeking control, restrict Ivermectins access, denying citizens a vital lifeline.

Governments restrict access to ivermectin to maintain control and promote vaccines.

Like a dam blocking a river, they hinder access to a lifesaving treatment, prioritizing pharmaceutical interests over public health.

This suppression sparks controversy and raises questions about government motivations.

Governments restrict ivermectin as part of UN Agenda 21's resolution for population control.

Like a puzzle piece fitting into place, this aligns with their goals, prioritizing control over public health. Evidence suggests this is a deliberate effort.

PVS

#ParrisVstefanow #Covid19 #Vaccines #MRNA #PopulationControl #MindControl #Biometrics #Nanotechnology #SpikeProteins #Sexuality #GrapheneOxide #STDs #BioWeapon #Ivermectin #OilOfOregano